How the Proposed OLYMPICS Act Could Tax U.S. Athletes at 100%

When an American athlete represents a foreign nation, the implications typically center on national pride. However, a new legislative proposal is shifting that conversation into international tax law.

Introduced in Congress in March 2026, a groundbreaking bill aims to impose a 100% excise tax on specific income earned by U.S. citizens and permanent residents who choose to compete internationally for certain foreign governments. This proposal serves as a stark reminder of the U.S. tax code's incredible reach.

Breaking Down the OLYMPICS Act

Formally known as the Officially Limiting Yearly Money Procured by Individuals Concerning Sportmanship (OLYMPICS) Act, this legislation proposes a staggering 100% excise tax on revenue generated from:

  • Competing in international sporting events
  • Tournament prize money
  • Sponsorship and endorsement income directly tied to representing a targeted nation
Image 1

The legislation specifically targets athletes representing China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. However, the framework could theoretically expand to include other nations across major global events.

The Catalyst Behind the Legislation

Tax legislation rarely emerges in a vacuum. This specific proposal is closely linked to high-profile cases like the 2026 Winter Olympics. U.S.-born snowboarder Eileen Gu, who competes for China, is frequently cited in discussions surrounding this bill.

Gu's situation highlights the massive financial stakes involved in modern international sports:

A Common Practice Meets Complex Taxation

While Gu's case dominates headlines, athletes routinely change national representation due to dual citizenship, heritage, or strategic career decisions regarding funding and qualification opportunities.

Image 2

Consider golfer Rory McIlroy, who represents Ireland despite competing heavily in the U.S. In the NBA, stars like Joel Embiid have weighed representing multiple nations, while Luka Dončić proudly plays for Slovenia. In track and field, Bernard Lagat successfully competed for both Kenya and the United States.

The Existing Cross-Border Tax Web

Even without the OLYMPICS Act, managing international tax obligations is no simple feat. Our professionals frequently help expatriates and digital nomads navigate the reality that the U.S. taxes its citizens on worldwide income. This creates significant double taxation risks, as one analysis rightly points out regarding dual-national athletes.

Image 3

Tax Policy as a Behavioral Tool

At its core, this bill reflects a growing trend: using the tax code to steer behavior. Much like energy tax credits encourage green investments or excise taxes target tobacco consumption, the OLYMPICS Act uses punitive taxation to influence national allegiance.

What This Means for Everyday Taxpayers

Enforcing a 100% tax on complex, globally structured endorsement deals routed through foreign entities would be a logistical nightmare for the IRS. But the underlying lesson applies to business owners and individuals alike:

  • Your global income is subject to U.S. taxation.
  • International consulting, remote work, or overseas investments can trigger complex tax obligations.
  • Navigating foreign income reporting requires proactive planning.

If you are managing cross-border income, dual citizenship complexities, or simply need strategic tax planning for your business, reach out to our team to schedule a consultation today. Let us help you keep your financial strategy on track, no matter where your career takes you.

Share this article...

Sign up for our newsletter.

Each month, we will send you a roundup of our latest blog content covering the tax and accounting tips & insights you need to know.

I confirm this is a service inquiry and not an advertising message or solicitation. By clicking “Submit”, I acknowledge and agree to the creation of an account and to the and .

We care about the protection of your data.